<h4>Chapter 578: Chapter 579 Star Resource Development Mission (2)</h4>


    "Ring?"


    All collectors are attracted by this concept. The channel begins to build a physical model of the orbital ring, which does not necessarily need to be very structural, but an upgraded version after the number of ster clouds increases to a certain extent. When there are so many objects in an orbit that theye into contact with each other and at constant speed, these objects It isbined into a ster-scale annr structure.


    Its strength is not high, because the scale is toorge. As long as there is a slightly stronger external force, such as the human atomic bomb, it can break the structure of this ring.


    But even so, it is already a very good idea, a n worthy of in-depth consideration by collectors.


    Some collectors suggested, "We can try to wrap stars with countless orbital rings, the utilization rate will be higher than the ster clouds, and there is no need to consider the problem of uneven forces attitude."


    This method can quite effectively avoid the disadvantages caused by rotation, and can also obtain more ster resources than the ster cloud scheme.


    However, this does not satisfy the collectors.


    "This is an ideal n, but it is still far from our ultimate goal."


    Suddenly, a collector became excited, and he happily confided his thoughts in the channel.


    "I thought of it!"


    "We can try tobine the characteristics of the ring orbit and let the star ball roll while rotating, so that two vertically moving orbits can be formed to fight against the ster gravity."


    As long as the north and south poles of the rotation axis are also moving around at the same time, won''t it avoid the problem ofck of centrifugal force! - The proposer of the n is thinking excitedly.


    Unfortunately, he was soon sshed with cold water by other peers.


    "...However, it is not feasible."


    "Huh? Why? For rolling motion, whether it is the equator or the axis of rotation, it should be able to get enough centrifugal force.


    The proposer is very puzzled. ording to its understanding, there should be no problem of weak points in the ster sphere, and each part can get enough centrifugal force against the star''s gravity.


    "It does solve the problem of ster gravity, but the star ball is a whole. ording to the way you described, there will be two centrifugal rings on the star ball, which will be perpendicr to each other, which causes the two torques at the intersection of the rings to squeeze together and lead to the two junctions. In the middle of the point, there will be another tensile force, and then when ites to the next junction, it will be squeezed. The structure of the star scale is already fragile, and such a toss will inevitably lead to tearing of the star sphere itself.


    "In contrast, because the rings are not connected to each other, they can always ensure that the centrifugal force is rtive to the direction of the star''s gravity. There is no need to consider the two moments. Each ring itself has a unique centrifugal ring."


    Soon, the physical model was figurative in the channel. The star ball that wrapped the star against centrifugal force by rotation and at the same time against centrifugal force of the rotation axis by rolling, as described by the refuting individual, was torn.


    But the Ring School did notst long, and soon some individuals refuted their ns.


    "The orbital ring also has a serious problem."


    "What is it?"


    The retor said, "Vulnerability, arge number of orbital rings will be needed to cover the whole star. But the problem is that if a orbital ring breaks for some reason, the ring will be thrown out and all the orbital rings will be broken.


    "That will be a painful loss for the ethnic group."


    The physical model of the ring was soon figurative in the channel. The retortion assumed that a small meteorite collided with one of the many orbital rings of the star, followed by a catastrophe. The disintegration of an orbital ring was thrown out under the action of the moment of rotation, and the scale of the orbital ring was star. The throwing distance was very far, and other orbital rings could not avoid orbital changes like satellites, so there was a collision, just like knocking down the first domino. In the end, all the orbital rings were destroyed and none of them survived.


    The collectors quickly abandoned this disappointing n and looked for a higher one.


    "...So, only ster clouds are practical and more feasible?"


    "It seems so."


    "Is there a further increase in the utilization rate of the star cloud?"


    Some individuals ask that it is a good way to transform it in a more feasible scheme.


    Soon, some individuals answered the reason why the number could not be further increased.


    "This is the limit. When the number of antimatter giants reaches an upper limit, the number continues to increase means that the gravitational disturbances between each otherbined with the ster gravity will form a multi-body system, and they may collide with each other."


    "We can distance the antimatter giants from each other to eliminate the disturbances between each other." Some collectors made suggestions.


    "But if that is the case, the production capacity of antimatter giants will be very low. We should be clear that the positrons and antiprotons that synthesize antihydrogen atoms from antimatter giants are from stars, which means that more positrons and antiprotons have been annihted before reaching the antimatter giant. Destroy it."


    In the end, the collectors had to think about other solutions. Although the scheme of the ster cloud is very reliable, it is too unsatisfactory, so it is abandoned like star spheres and orbital rings.


    "The scheme of ster clouds cannot be adopted. This low-utilization method is not the star utilization expected by the group. We should set the ultimate goal of the scheme to set the n as how to extract those sma substances directly from the stars, rather than thinking about how to obtain material from the ster wind."


    "Pultract? That''s something that can''t be done at all. Even if the sma is fluid, how can we make a straw that can prate into the sea of ster sma?


    "Yes, no molecr material can resist the burning of the star. After the mass of matter falls into the star, will change into a sma state due to the increase of internal energy."


    The collectors quarreled and couldn''t think of a good solution. They were confused.


    "Then we don''t use molecr materials, we use more basic things."


    "What to use? Concreation? If there is no pressure, there is no way to maintain the material form.


    "Use...! Yes! We can use the field to build such a straw! Pull out the material from the star!"


    The individuals in the quarrel suddenly came up with an inspiration and came up with a wonderful idea. Since it is impossible for them to go deep into the stars and extract the ster matter, can''t they let the ster matter take the initiative toe out?


    "How do you want to achieve it? The star itself is a huge ma, and the maic field can extend to the Kuiper belt or even farther. How can we generate a stronger maic field than to avoid interference from the star''s maic field itself?


    It is true that a star is a sma, but if you want to rely on the maic field to operate the star, it needs to be strong enough, at least not lower than the maic field of the star itself.


    But the individual quickly came up with another method.


    "Why do you insist on using maic fields?"


    "What do you use without maic fields?" Other collectors were stunned.


    "Use the gravitational field."


    "...what should I do?"


    "We can create a ck hole and use the gravity of the ck hole to suck out the matter in the star."